Three newly elected Latvian MPs facing criminal charges, new parliament must decide on proceedings
Three politicians facing criminal accusations have been elected to Latvia's 15th Saeima, and once their mandates are confirmed, the parliament will need to decide whether to allow the ongoing criminal proceedings against them to continue.
/nginx/o/2026/09/09/17906722t1h397d.jpg)
Following the elections to Latvia's 15th Saeima, three of the newly elected members are individuals who face accusations of criminal offenses. Once the new parliament's composition is officially confirmed, lawmakers will be required to decide whether the criminal proceedings already initiated against these three colleagues may proceed.
Why parliamentary approval is required
Under Latvia's legal framework, members of the Saeima enjoy a degree of immunity intended to protect elected representatives from unfounded persecution and to safeguard their independence while carrying out their duties. However, this protection does not mean that a criminal case against a sitting deputy is automatically halted indefinitely. Instead, continuing such proceedings requires the consent of parliament. As a result, lawmakers elected while already facing criminal investigations now depend on a vote by their peers to determine what happens next.
What happens after mandates are confirmed
According to available information, the question of granting consent to continue the criminal proceedings will only be addressed after the mandates of the newly elected deputies have been formally confirmed. This reflects standard procedure, since individuals do not formally hold full deputy status — with its associated rights and obligations — until their mandates are confirmed.
The 15th Saeima is expected to begin its work soon and will need to address this matter concerning three of its members. The eventual decision on whether to allow the criminal proceedings to continue will set an important precedent for the new parliamentary term, illustrating how lawmakers balance the legal protections afforded to deputies against the need to uphold the rule of law.
/nginx/o/2026/09/18/17924777t1h90cd.jpg)

/nginx/o/2026/10/05/17956460t1h1fd1.jpg)