Liepāja woman wins court battle against debt collector over long-forgotten loan
A woman from Liepāja has won a court case against one of the largest debt collection companies over a long-forgotten, unpaid loan, in a dispute centered on whether a computer screenshot counts as valid evidence.

A woman living in Liepāja has been through a lengthy legal dispute with one of the largest debt collection companies, stemming from a financial decision she made back in her youth, during the so-called "fat years" — a period of economic boom when taking out loans was common.
What the dispute was about
The loan appears to have been forgotten over the years, but the debt collection company later pursued the woman, demanding repayment. The central legal question in the case was whether a screenshot taken from a computer screen could serve as sufficient and reliable evidence in court to prove the debt existed and to compel the debtor to pay.
The court's ruling
After reviewing the case, the court sided with the Liepāja woman, and the debt collection company lost the case. This means that, in this instance, the screenshot submitted as evidence was not deemed adequate grounds for the claim to recover the money.
The case draws attention to a broader question of what kind of documentation and evidence debt collection companies are permitted to use when taking people to court over financial obligations dating back many years. Disputes of this kind could become relevant to other debtors whose old obligations might resurface based on similar digital evidence.


