'Better deal': Why Trump rejected Iran's truce offer

US President Donald Trump has rejected a truce offer put forward by Iran, raising questions about the administration's next moves toward Tehran.

Sanctions as leverage

According to experts, Trump's decision stems from a belief that the existing economic sanctions on Iran remain the most effective tool for pressuring the country into making further concessions beyond what a truce alone would secure. In this view, sanctions are not simply a bargaining chip to be traded away for a ceasefire-style arrangement, but rather an ongoing source of leverage that Trump wants to preserve and use to negotiate what he considers a better deal.

A risky calculation

Analysts caution, however, that this strategy carries genuine risk. By declining Iran's current offer, Trump could ultimately end up losing the leverage he holds today, since circumstances can shift over time and there is no guarantee that a more favourable deal will materialise later.

Experts frame the situation as a trade-off between maintaining economic pressure in hopes of a stronger future outcome and the possibility of missing a workable resolution that was already on the table. How that balance plays out will only become clear as the standoff between Washington and Tehran continues.