Wednesday, 1 July 2026
Rīga TV

World and Latvian news in one place

TechnologyPublished: 2 July 2026 at 01:37

Mexico's Victory Over Ecuador Causes Seismic Vibrations: Was It an Artificial Earthquake?

After Mexico's win over Ecuador in the World Cup, fan celebrations generated a significant seismic signal, but experts clarify it was not a real earthquake.

Foto: Wired

On Tuesday, Mexico defeated Ecuador 2-0 in the round of 32 of the 2026 World Cup, with goals from Julián Quiñones and Raúl Jiménez. Following both goals, fans erupted in such celebration that a Raspberry Shake seismograph near the Mexico City Stadium recorded a "significant artificial signal," according to Mexico's Digital Platform for Early Warning and Comprehensive Risk Management (SASSLA). The system noted on social media that "the outburst of euphoria and mass cheering produced vibrations in the local area."

Similar incidents have occurred before. In 2018, when Mexico beat Germany in Russia, Mexico's Institute of Geological and Atmospheric Research reported a seismic signal likely caused by "mass jumping." In recent weeks, geophysicists in Bergen, Norway, detected vibrations whenever the national team scored during group matches in North America. In 2024, a Taylor Swift concert at SoFi Stadium in Los Angeles generated long-duration, low-frequency signals with harmonic frequency peaks between 1 and 10 Hz.

Experts emphasize that the term "artificial earthquake" as used in the media is inaccurate. True artificial earthquakes do exist—human-induced quakes from construction, water extraction, or fracking—but they must be linked to geological processes. Arturo Iglesias, a researcher at the National Autonomous University of Mexico's Institute of Geophysics, explained: "Even if a person jumps next to a sensor, it's detected, but it's not an earthquake. An earthquake caused by the scattered activity of fans is a joke."

Nevertheless, researchers acknowledge that studying vibrations from synchronized movements of thousands of people is becoming increasingly relevant. Better understanding of these signals could improve methods for analyzing seismic activity and foster techniques like seismic interferometry, which uses everyday sources to study subsurface structures without controlled explosions or waiting for natural earthquakes.

Comments

0/1500

Comments are automatically moderated. No hate, threats, personal data or spam.

Loading comments…

More in this category