Finance Minister Criticizes Study on Government Tax Package
A study by the Praxis think tank on the impact of Estonia's tax package has drawn criticism from Finance Minister Jürgen Ligi, who called its conclusions careless and based on outdated data. The study found the tax changes hit low-income households hardest.

A study by the Praxis think tank on the impact of the government's tax package has sparked disagreement. The analysis concluded that the tax changes have had the greatest negative impact on lower-income households, including low-wage earners, single parents, and elderly women living alone.
Finance Minister Jürgen Ligi (Reform Party) criticized the study, calling its conclusions careless and based on outdated data that does not reflect the current economic reality. "To say that poor people have a harder time than wealthy people — yes, I agree with that. But overall, you can't say, as this study does, that taxes must not be collected, taxes must not be increased and the budget must not be cut. That's schizophrenia," Ligi said.
Christian Veske, the gender equality and equal treatment commissioner, who commissioned the study, said that even seemingly small amounts are critical for low-income households because indirect taxes and the rising cost of living consume what little financial cushion they have. "If your monthly income falls by, say, €24 or €18, that is a significant amount that you have to factor into your budget and it means you have to give something up," Veske said.
Veske also criticized the Ministry of Finance's universal, short-term crisis support measures, saying they are ineffective in the long run. "They themselves acknowledged in their response that, because the issues were urgent for them, they may not have carried out impact assessments as thoroughly as they should have. If everyone receives support, the effect is diluted for the people who actually need it," Veske said.
Ligi countered that in absolute terms, the tax burden clearly falls more heavily on wealthier people. The government has increased subsistence benefits, but eliminating taxes is not a way to help lower-income residents. "A number of policy choices, including the motor vehicle tax, have been designed to have as little impact as possible on people's ability to make ends meet while placing a greater burden on wealthier people. Its burden is very strongly correlated with income, meaning that wealthier people and wealthier regions pay more," Ligi said.
The finance minister said last year was indeed economically difficult, but the current rapid growth in the minimum wage and the incomes of lower-paid workers disproves claims that poor people are becoming even poorer. An increase in the single-parent benefit will also take effect this fall.
The study analyzed tax changes entering into force in 2025 and 2026 and concludes that they have a negative effect on subsistence, hitting especially hard those who already find themselves in a more vulnerable socioeconomic situation. "People with low incomes are in an especially difficult position, particularly when they also belong to another at-risk group. Although the Gender Equality Act requires government agencies to systematically and purposefully promote gender equality, the tax changes in question have had the greatest negative impact on women in vulnerable situations," the study's summary reads.


