Indonesian court convicts 19 in baby trafficking ring; what happens to the babies now?
An Indonesian court found 19 people guilty of procuring at least 34 babies for adoption, with at least 12 sent to Singapore. The verdict raises the critical question of whether these children should be returned to Indonesia.

An Indonesian court on Tuesday convicted 19 people for baby trafficking, concluding a high-profile case but leaving a key question unanswered: what will happen to the babies who have been sent to Singapore? The trafficking ring was found guilty of procuring at least 34 infants for adoption, with at least 12 of them sent to Singapore. The case has garnered attention in both countries, and the verdict has sharpened the debate over the children's future.
Adoptive parents in Singapore, who have been caring for the babies, are anxious about whether they will be allowed to keep them. David (a pseudonym), a Singaporean parent who previously spoke to the BBC, said after the verdict that he hopes both governments will make a quick decision based on the best interests of the children. He emphasized that his family and the child are victims of circumstances and that they want a normal family life.
Indonesia's foreign affairs ministry stated that several aspects require further examination, including the children's legal status, the identities of their biological parents, and ongoing proceedings in Singapore. Singaporean authorities have not yet responded to the BBC's latest queries.
Ni Made Martini Puteri, a criminologist at the University of Indonesia, noted that there is little data on what happens to trafficked children after rescue, especially if they have been taken overseas. Anti-trafficking and child rights groups in Indonesia argue that the children should be returned to their biological parents as a matter of principle.
Ai Maryanti, a commissioner with Indonesia's independent child protection commission, said the children's best interests have not been sufficiently considered and that the adoptions should not be treated as final because they were based on manipulation. During the trial, it emerged that the trafficking ring submitted false information to obtain birth certificates and family cards, listing ring members as the children's birth mothers. Local officials issued documents without proper checks.
Annulling the adoptions in Singapore and returning the children would be complicated, as lawyers say they are unaware of any case where an adoption order was revoked in Singapore. Courts could consider factors such as the psychological impact on the child, the duration of stay in Singapore, and the family conditions in Indonesia. Since the babies' birth certificates have been proven fraudulent, the basis of the adoptions may be questionable.
Indonesian authorities have not identified all the biological parents, meaning some children may have no one to return to. If returned, they would be placed in state care; eight other babies rescued from the ring are already in an orphanage in Bandung.
Puteri argued that if a child has only known life in Singapore since infancy, it might make more sense for them to stay with their adoptive parents. However, if biological parents are later identified, the child should have the right to know their origins. She also called for Singapore to treat these children as trafficking victims and provide protection, including to the adoptive parents if they were unaware of the trafficking.


